After the record

If the patch is not the cure, the next ask has to name the wound.

A board comment that only says “stop cutting” will be answered with the deficit slide. A comment that cites the allotment gap, the recapture line, the TAP-vs-closure math, and a campus timestamp is harder to file away. This page is a checklist, not a campaign script.

A feed is not a bond

Sharing a chart is not the same as sitting next to someone whose kid lost a bus stop. The state can recapture hundreds of millions while a local contract still reimburses rental cars. Neither yields if the only civic habit left is doomscrolling the outrage and closing the tab.

What does not substitute

A website, including this one — even one drafted with AI. A nickname for the superintendent. A private group chat that never becomes a timestamped question. Those can start a thought. They do not audit a contract or move Chapter 49.

What still has a chance

Show up with the table: recapture $715.5M adopted; allotment $6,160 + $55; superintendent base $362,250 plus $36,750 retirement and reimbursed travel including a rental car; ~$60M one-time property monetization; librarian line under $1M. Ask that those lines be in the same packet as class size. Repeat the next month.

Two rooms, two jobs

AISD Board of Trustees

Can move local choices: where cuts land, whether August librarian replacements come off campuses again, bus hubs vs ADA, how closed land is sold, whether presentations include inflation and recapture on the same slide as class size.

board@austinisd.org
Public comment: 512-414-0130 · meeting page

Texas Legislature / TEA formula

Owns the basic allotment, GYIA, Chapter 49 recapture, and ADA-based funding. A $55 add-on does not index $6,160 to inflation. Local property-tax elections in a recapture district leak by design.

TEA state funding · Texas Legislature

Send a numbered note, not a mood

The form opens your mail app to the board. SOLATX does not receive a copy.